[Tagging] bicycle=no

Mike Harris mikh43 at googlemail.com
Tue Dec 8 17:30:59 GMT 2009


Almost every single one in England and Wales - clearly defined, in the public domain and of great use to some of us to have the information in the database.

Mike Harris
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tagging-bounces at openstreetmap.org 
> [mailto:tagging-bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Andre Engels
> Sent: 08 December 2009 10:37
> To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no
> 
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roy Wallace 
> <waldo000000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Definitely a step in the right direction, i.e. separating "legal 
> > status" from "defacto status".
> >
> > I'd be tempted to also use bicycle:signed=yes/no to clarify when the
> > (legal?) status is derived from evidence on the ground as 
> opposed to a 
> > law book.
> 
> Sounds unnecessary to me - How many roads and paths have 
> their status defined in the law book?
> 
> 
> --
> André Engels, andreengels at gmail.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 





More information about the Tagging mailing list