[Tagging] bicycle=no

Mike Harris mikh43 at googlemail.com
Tue Dec 8 17:30:59 GMT 2009


 ... On the last point - could we even deprecate designated= - I find it
confusing and redundant and always use designation = (see wiki pages) - but
maybe this is wrong?

Mike Harris
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tagging-bounces at openstreetmap.org 
> [mailto:tagging-bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Roy Wallace
> Sent: 08 December 2009 10:21
> To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no
> 
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Richard Mann 
> <richard.mann.westoxford at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Are we edging towards:
> >
> > bicycle=yes|no|private|permissive|unknown - legal status
> >
> > designation=* - your local (national) name for the legal status
> >
> > 
> bicycle:defacto=prevented|forbidden|tolerated|discouraged|accepted|sup
> > ported|established
> > - the apparent practical status, which you can use or not use, 
> > depending on your personal standards of verifiability (and the 
> > evidence available)
> 
> Definitely a step in the right direction, i.e. separating 
> "legal status" from "defacto status".
> 
> I'd be tempted to also use bicycle:signed=yes/no to clarify when the
> (legal?) status is derived from evidence on the ground as 
> opposed to a law book.
> 
> By the way, it's a pity that "designation"
> (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation) sounds 
> so much like "designated"
> (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated)...
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 





More information about the Tagging mailing list