mikh43 at googlemail.com
Tue Dec 8 17:30:59 GMT 2009
... On the last point - could we even deprecate designated= - I find it
confusing and redundant and always use designation = (see wiki pages) - but
maybe this is wrong?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tagging-bounces at openstreetmap.org
> [mailto:tagging-bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Roy Wallace
> Sent: 08 December 2009 10:21
> To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Richard Mann
> <richard.mann.westoxford at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Are we edging towards:
> > bicycle=yes|no|private|permissive|unknown - legal status
> > designation=* - your local (national) name for the legal status
> > ported|established
> > - the apparent practical status, which you can use or not use,
> > depending on your personal standards of verifiability (and the
> > evidence available)
> Definitely a step in the right direction, i.e. separating
> "legal status" from "defacto status".
> I'd be tempted to also use bicycle:signed=yes/no to clarify when the
> (legal?) status is derived from evidence on the ground as
> opposed to a law book.
> By the way, it's a pity that "designation"
> (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation) sounds
> so much like "designated"
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Tagging