stevagewp at gmail.com
Wed Dec 9 07:20:42 GMT 2009
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Roy Wallace <waldo000000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, sure, being "easy" to tag is good, but you have to weigh it up
> against the disadvantages, including not being directly verifiable.
Personally, I find that a very small disadvantage. By far and away the
biggest problem with OSM data at the moment is lack of coverage. Let us all
look forward to the day when the biggest problem is that some footpaths
should have been tagged bike paths, or vice versa, because the definitions
weren't 'verifiable' enough.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging