[Tagging] A first step towards bringing the wiki and tool support closer together
erjohan at gmail.com
Wed Dec 9 11:57:31 GMT 2009
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Peter Childs <pchilds at bcs.org> wrote:
> 2009/12/9 Erik Johansson <erjohan at gmail.com>:
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Roy Wallace <waldo000000 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Craig Wallace <craigw84 at fastmail.fm> wrote:
>>>> See these pages:
>>>> As that page says, its probably more acurrate to say "Don't deliberately tag
>>>> incorrectly for the renderer".
>>> Yup, but to "tag *correctly* for the renderer" is simply to "tag correctly". :P
>> Yes but people say "don't tag for the renderer" which a horrible meme,
>> I say "always tag for the renderer". If there is not visual feedback
>> you are doing it wrong (except in keepright).
> By "Don't Tag for the renderer" we generally mean don't tag for one
> particular renderer, Its like writing a website for IE that does not
> work in Firefox; Not a good idea.
You can not deny it's misused all the time, as seen in this thread.
But considering how long it takes for things to show up on the
renderer I do agree that it's a problem:
e.g. Golf courses
OSM data link:
Blog posts with rendering:
How can this be done better?
More information about the Tagging