[Tagging] Tagging highway=cycleway without explicit knowledge of the law?

James Livingston doctau at mac.com
Sat Dec 12 02:05:15 GMT 2009


On 12/12/2009, at 7:47 AM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:02 PM, James Livingston <doctau at mac.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The current solution I've seen near Brisbane is "do whatever you prefer", which is why several paths flip back and forwards between footway and cycleway depending on who traced each section :-\ Given that I don't know which is appropriate, I haven't felt like retagging my many kilometres of inter-connected footways or someone else's many kilometres of inter-connected cycleway - especially since they may have had more than just the imagery to go on.
> 
> Thanks James. About having "more than just the imagery to go on",
> didn't they use source=*?? tisk tisk :P

It had source=nearmap because it was traced from nearmap. I've never seen source:highway=* to indicate how they decided what kind of path it is.




More information about the Tagging mailing list