[Tagging] bicycle=no

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Thu Dec 17 01:18:20 GMT 2009

Chris Hill wrote:

> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> I'd tag a section marked as "cyclists must dismount" as a footway,
>> bicycle=destination (since there's no way in hell you'd want to take a
>> route that bogus as anything but a last resort).
> Except that in Hull, UK two of the National Cycle Network routes (1 & 
> 65) share a footpath with a 'Cyclists Dismount' sign [1].  It makes good 
> sense as it keeps cyclists off the otherwise very busy main roads into 
> the city centre.  I'd push my bike a short way to gain that benefit.

I wouldn't tag for the routing engine on this one:  You can't ride
through it, so it's effectively bicycle=destination even if it is part
of the NCN.  I'd rather follow a legal path that I don't have to get off
than follow a numbered route created by a moron.

More information about the Tagging mailing list