[Tagging] bicycle=no

Roy Wallace waldo000000 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 17 23:25:51 GMT 2009


On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> Steve Bennett wrote:
>
>> (It does make me think that *signed* bicycle prohibitions should be
>> tagged differently from *statutory* bicycle prohibitions, though. As
>> the OP said, you really don't want to ignore a sign like that.)
>
> Unless your local jurisdiction is violating international law, there is
> no difference between the two.  And if your local jurisdiction is
> violating international law, you should be encouraging them to fix the
> problem.

I agree with Steve - "*signed* bicycle prohibitions should be tagged
differently from *statutory* bicycle prohibitions" - if at the very
least with a source tag, e.g.:

bicycle=no + source:bicycle=lawbook
bicycle=no + source:bicycle=sign




More information about the Tagging mailing list