[Tagging] bicycle=no

Steve Bennett stevagewp at gmail.com
Fri Dec 18 03:43:23 GMT 2009


On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:

> Steve Bennett wrote:
>
> > (It does make me think that *signed* bicycle prohibitions should be
> > tagged differently from *statutory* bicycle prohibitions, though. As
> > the OP said, you really don't want to ignore a sign like that.)
>
> Unless your local jurisdiction is violating international law, there is
> no difference between the two.


Wait, there is no difference between a sign and an intangible law? Perhaps
not legally speaking, but in practice there is a huge difference. You can
interpret the sign as "AND WE MEAN IT".


> And if your local jurisdiction is
> violating international law, you should be encouraging them to fix the
> problem.
>

Your suggestion is ever so slightly beyond the scope of this list.

(You weren't serious were you?)

Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20091218/2513df2d/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list