[Tagging] Highway property proposal "covered=yes"

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Nov 2 10:52:10 GMT 2009

2009/11/2 Randy <rwtnospam-newsgp at yahoo.com>

> I did look up the definition of tunnel in my Webster's Unabridged, and
> will concede that, that particular dictionary did seemingly restrict it to
> underground. However, in the verb form it defined creating a passage under
> or through something.

So I guess if you tunnel through an above ground
> object you are creating something other than a tunnel. That's supposed to
> make sense?


Here is some examples (talk-de) what some people think to be accurately
tagged as tunnel whilst it will obfuscate the database if we would.


this one is not rendered correctly if just using layer=1 on the building due
to mapnik rules (they always render ways above buildings and do not respect
layers for these cases).


this one produces the "obstacle-problem" you would not have with a real

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20091102/0442781f/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list