[Tagging] tagging the multipolygon model (was landuse and military)
sly (sylvain letuffe)
liste at letuffe.org
Fri Oct 16 11:23:13 BST 2009
On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Anthony wrote:
> > now ease our pain and accept it.
> I do accept it, but it's wrong, so I want to fix it.
That is reasonnable thinking.
What ever the solution is (fix it in the osm database automatically, construct
export aware with the fix, re-think the multipolygon system model)
What I wanted to point out was that mappers are not to blame. And that we
shouldn't put the burden on them, as this is computer guessable.
In the real, that might become a note, a comment on the multipolygon page to
say : "The inner polygon system is a database construct, as a mapper you are
free to add it to the relation or not, as it might be done automatically at a
What I'm looking for unsuccessfully is : "Does a case exist where an inner
polygon couldn't be found automatically and has to be explicitly tagged ?"
Sylvain Letuffe liste at letuffe.org
qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org
More information about the Tagging