[Tagging] craft= Proposal
simone.saviolo at gmail.com
Tue Aug 24 13:28:53 BST 2010
2010/8/24 Peter Körner <osm-lists at mazdermind.de>:
> Am 24.08.2010 13:38, schrieb Elena of Valhalla:
>> On 8/24/10, Peter Körner<osm-lists at mazdermind.de> wrote:
>>> Am 24.08.2010 12:17, schrieb Liz:
>>>> the butcher and baker are working with raw materials, producing
>>>> temporary and not required to have beauty in its form
>>> What, there is no beauty in my rump steak? I cant accept that, it's not
>>> true!!!1eleven11! ;)
>> you're kidding, but what about a (real) sushi chef who produces
>> something temporary, but is also required to give extreme care to the
>> estetics of the dish?
> I think we should stick with the general classification "a sushi restaurant"
> and ignore the specialty "a specific sushi chef" when dealing with tagging.
> As Emilie Laffray said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and so it can't
> be part of our definition for craft=.
> I'd like Élisée Reclus proposal better: if it sells something to end
> customers is a shop and not a craft.
A sculptor (and an art gallery, often) ultimately hopes to sell his
artwork. By that criterion, nothing would be cratfsmanship.
More information about the Tagging