[Tagging] self-storage facilities
Ed Hillsman
ehillsman at tampabay.rr.com
Sat Dec 11 23:32:19 GMT 2010
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:04:11 +1100, Steve Bennett
<stevagewp at gmail.com> wrote:
>I think "storage" and "self-storage" imply different things. The
>former would be warehousing etc for business customers, and the latter
>for the general public.
>
>That said, I'd be inclined to go with amenity=storage for both, with
>some subtag like self_storage=yes where appropriate. We should have
>less top-level tags.
I had been inclined to avoid amenity= because of the volume of past
comments on other proposals, concerned about the number of "amenity"
values. But amenity=storage makes sense. Because so many self-storage
facilities are businesses, owned by different companies, landuse= is
less appropriate. Amenity=storage would lie within landuse=commercial
or, in some instances landuse=industrial, with operator= or name= for
the firm, and self_storage=yes. Internal driveways, parking,
buildings, and external fences and gates could be mapped if desired.
Ed
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20101211/a377b919/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list