[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Narrow width
waldo000000 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 22 21:27:07 GMT 2010
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> But that's the point. If you write on a segment of residential "width=4",
> it will be narrow in US and normal in old Europe. That's why I said that a
> width is only useful if you can compare it to something else.
Let's say I'm in a truck that's 4m wide.
I come to a road with width=3 - that is indeed "useful".
I come to a road with narrow=yes - that is not as "useful".
> I'm still waiting a proposal for the default width per highway category.
I don't think that's necessary. It's ok for the width to be "unknown"
- it just means the map isn't complete yet :)
More information about the Tagging