[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carpool

[Nathan Edgars II]

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:08 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
<dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/11/13 John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>:
>> On 13 November 2010 21:38, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> access no is completely wrong IMHO, better might be access=private,
>>> which also might be wrong, as the access might be allowed, but not to
>>> park there.
>>
>> access=destination ?
>
> My point was that access is about the accessibility while here it
> might be needed a tag to indicate who is allowed to park.

We use access=private for private parking lots, do we not?