[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carpool

Rodolphe Quiedeville rodolphe at quiedeville.org
Sun Nov 14 14:35:02 GMT 2010


Le 14/11/2010 12:15, Nathan Edgars II a écrit :
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:08 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2010/11/13 John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>:
>>> On 13 November 2010 21:38, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> access no is completely wrong IMHO, better might be access=private,
>>>> which also might be wrong, as the access might be allowed, but not to
>>>> park there.
>>>
>>> access=destination ?
>>
>> My point was that access is about the accessibility while here it
>> might be needed a tag to indicate who is allowed to park.
> 
> We use access=private for private parking lots, do we not?

No parking where you can do carpooling are not private, you can park
without doing carpooling too.

Regards


-- 
Rodolphe Quiédeville - Artisan Logiciel Libre
Travailleur indépendant spécialisé en logiciel libre
http://rodolphe.quiedeville.org/
SIP/XMPP : rodolphe at quiedeville.org



More information about the Tagging mailing list