[Tagging] operator and brand WAS: Re: community centres
Pieren
pieren3 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 1 12:30:30 BST 2010
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Simone Saviolo <simone.saviolo at gmail.com>wrote:
> If a McDonald's is tagged with the new schema, the name
> will be missing, and the consumer will use the brand ("McDonald's");
> if it's tagged with the old schema, the name will be "McDonald's", and
> there won't be much of a difference.
>
>
That's where I disagree. For simplicity, the tag "name" should remain as
mandatory for naming stuff and keep operator and brand as options for
supplementary information.
Otherwise we will find quickly on the wiki amenities/shops with names and
some with operators/brands only or the name as last option (as it happend in
the past for "bank" and today for fuel station), etc... In short, the chaos.
Pieren
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20101001/04531d67/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list