[Tagging] Successful proposal

[Lennard]

On 13-10-2010 9:43, Peter Körner wrote:

> I contacted him and we're still in a very interesting discussion. His
> opinion is, that the map-features should list the *most common used*
> features and it's clear that with 500 uses, craft does not fall into
> this category. So I can accept this tag not being listed on map-features
> but findable via a the search. This is a definition problem of what
> should be on the map-features page.

And how exactly would the craft tag become widely used if people have to 
out on a limb to find it, exactly because it's not mentioned in the Map 
Features? This will only hamper adoption.


-- 
Lennard