[Tagging] [Talk-us] stop signs
Anthony
osm at inbox.org
Wed Oct 27 16:24:18 BST 2010
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
<dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/10/27 Anthony <osm at inbox.org>:
>
>> One proposal for mapping stop signs is that the stop sign always faces
>> opposite the nearest intersection.
>
> so let's discuss about this. I don't think it is a good idea to have
> implicit facing, I would prefer to - at least in exceptional cases -
> be able to define manually which is the facing of the sign, or better:
> on which way at which point (intersection) there is a stopping
> obligation.
Yeah, that's pretty much what I said above.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/compass
I vote for highway=stop + compass=X on the way at the stop line plus
traffic_sign=stop + compass=X at the actual stop sign location.
Actually, I don't "vote" for anything. The tag highway=stop is
already being used this way (sans compass=X), the tag
traffic_sign=stop is the obvious extension of traffic_sign=*, and
compass=X is unlikely to interfere with anyone else's tagging
(although if there is already a tag for this then I'll use that
instead). The use of compass=X is obviously optional, but it gives a
way to be explicit in the normal case and gives a way to correct the
default in the exceptional case. Without editor support it probably
won't be heavily used, but oh well. In the meantime, if someone wants
to use the tag stop:direction=forward/backward, a bot could go through
the db periodically and fix that into compass=X (when there is only
one way, and the direction of the underlying way has not changed since
the tag was added).
More information about the Tagging
mailing list