[Tagging] tagging single trees
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Sep 6 08:16:41 BST 2010
2010/9/6 Serge Wroclawski <emacsen at gmail.com>:
>> In practice, it seems unlikely that any one will try to tag every tree in a forest
> It's entirely possible to map every tree in a city.
I agree to both of you. For subtagging I think that there is already
some documentation in the wiki (not all are already on the tree-page):
- species
- height
- circumference (of the trunk)
- start_date (for the age, maybe also estimated age + note-tag)
and others like landmark=yes, monument=yes have been suggested on the
MLs or discussion pages. Even tourism=attraction might exist.
I'd actually prefer an estimated start_date over a generic historic=yes tag.
cheers,
Martin
More information about the Tagging
mailing list