[Tagging] tagging single trees

[Alan Mintz]

At 2010-09-05 18:22, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 8:08 PM, John F. Eldredge <john at jfeldredge.com> wrote:
> > In practice, it seems unlikely that any one will try to tag every tree 
> in a forest
>
>It's entirely possible to map every tree in a city. Someone else
>mentioned Girona, I'll mention that Washington, DC's data contains
>trees and could be imported. Another independent organization in the
>city also contains tree data- not just the location of the trees but
>the species as well as date the tree was planted.
>
>There's no reason to think that individual trees will not be mapped.
>
>"Special"/historical trees could be mapped tagged historic=yes

This approx 50 sq mi area of Bakersfield, CA, USA contains over 41,000 
trees that were imported: 
node[bbox=-119.15,35.29,-119.0,35.38][natural=tree]. No other descriptive 
info is present.

--
Alan Mintz <Alan_Mintz+OSM at Earthlink.net>