[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

[John Smith]

On 6 September 2010 18:09, Tom Chance <tom at acrewoods.net> wrote:
> This is really unecessary and pedantic. Every person with any application in
> mind for real-world generators (as opposed to school physics lessons on the
> theory of generation) would understand and appreciate what is meant by the
> proposed tags.

It might be worth tagging the type of fission reactor, if known.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nuclear_power_reactor_types