[Tagging] RFC: new values for surface=*
Dmitry Granovsky
dima.granovsky at gmail.com
Mon Sep 6 13:26:05 BST 2010
Hi, Martin,
Sorry that I have not mentioned that the proposal isn't mine (I am
nothing here but a translator) and I am not really eager to discuss
it. So perhaps it would be better if the discussion took place at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Surface:all_weather.
Thank you.
2010/9/6 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
> 2010/9/6 Dmitry Granovsky <dima.granovsky at gmail.com>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Here is the proposal originating from Russia:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Surface:all_weather.
>>
>> Basically, it involves splitting surface=unpaved into two more
>> specific categories (more details on the proposal page). Your comments
>> are welcome on the discussion page:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Surface:all_weather.
>>
>> I am not sure whether I should cross-post this to talk at . Feel free to
>> forward this message there if necessary.
>
>
> IMHO surface=paved/unpaved are to be considered deprecated. Please use
> more specific values (asphalt, dirt, cobblestone, etc.), see your page
> for some of the suggested values (e.g. I don't agree in all
> categorization you did, IMHO grass_paver is a paved value, but it
> doesn't matter as long as you tag what is there):
> (your own list):
> * paved
> o asphalt
> o cobblestone
> o concrete
> o metal
> o paving_stones
> * unpaved (not recommended)
> o all_weather
> + compacted
> + gravel
> + pebblestone
> + grass_paver
> + wood
> o ground
> + earth
> + mud
> + grass
> + sand
> + dirt
> o ice_road
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
--
Best regards,
Dmitry V. Granovsky
More information about the Tagging
mailing list