[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - social facility

[M∡rtin Koppenhoefer]

2010/9/28 Sean Horgan <seanhorgan at gmail.com>:
> Ok.  I'm seeing the trend here: succinctness.


yes, maybe it's my personal preference, but I'd always go for the
shorter version, if the content is the same..


>> >  Or is your point that
>> > "assisted living" is a confusing term?
>> no, not at all. You are describing the office / place of the
>> administration and not the place, where the work is done (the home of
>> the assisted people), right?
> correct.


so then this might be better in office=assisted_living. Your
definition says: "A social facility is a place where social services,
as defined here, are conducted". In the case of the
office/administration it is not the place, where the services are
conducted IMHO.


>> really? You would tag a place where heroine-addicts go to consume
>> their drugs "healthcare"?
>
> Provided that the primary purposes of this place were the safety and health
> of the users, then I would say yes.

yes, that's the case in these facilities I'm referring to. The thing
is that "healthcare" to me sounds more like a place where addicts
might go for medical treatment/examination then a place like this
http://www.n-tv.de/img/59/593579/O_1000_680_680_Fixerstube.jpg where
they can (ab)use drugs, which is not really healthy (but surely better
then doing it on the toilet of the station).

While it might be possible to tag these rooms as healthcare I still
think they should be distinctable from other places for drug addicts,
that do medical treatment/examination. What about
social_facility=healthcare for the latter and
social_facility=drug_consumption for the first?

cheers,
Martin