On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:58:44 +0100 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote: > > Definitely historic=obelisk, I think. It doesn't really matter if > > it's *old*, it's still *historical*. > > > not all of them. A Las Vegas Obelisk is hardly to be called > "historical". historical=fake :D