[Tagging] Counterflow Lanes

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Mon Feb 21 01:51:56 GMT 2011


On 02/19/2011 08:08 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 2/19/2011 7:24 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
>> The Massey Tunnel is currently tagged with oneway=no on the reversible
>> section and through the tunnel itself.
>>
>> For the reversible sections (that lead up to the tunnel) they really
>> alternate between oneway=-1, oneway=yes and access=no. For the two
>> parallel
>> tunnels themselves they alternate between oneway=yes and oneway=no.
>>
>> I'm not sure what the solution is, but oneway=reversible isn't a special
>> case of oneway=yes so it would break existing data consumers.
> 
> Don't we want to break existing consumers if they might route people the
> wrong way down a one-way highway?

This whole question suggests that we're somehow responsible for data
consumers paying more attention to their navigation than what's out
their windshield, which is an entirely specious argument for obvious
reasons.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20110220/35278c32/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Tagging mailing list