[Tagging] Boundaries for suburbs
josh at joshdoe.com
Fri Feb 25 17:53:37 GMT 2011
I agree that the boundary relation is the "correct" way to do this.
>From the wiki, it appears that the 'label' role is accepted.
Is it just that Mapnik hasn't gotten around to rendering this yet, or
is there some other reason? I really should try and learn about
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:36 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
<dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/2/25 Tyler Gunn <tyler at egunn.com>:
>> Example One:
>> - "place=suburb" node central to neighborhood: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1168219909
> is the approximative way to place a label and is rendered by mapnik
>> - Boundary relation with the the "place" node marked as a label: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1438874; included the place attributes on the boundary as well. Not sure if required.
> is IMHO the "correct" way to do it, but is not recognized by Mapnik.
>> Zooming in once more reveals TWO labels for the area:
> This is an result of Mapnik rendering the node as a label and
> rendering the name of _any_ area at high zoom levels. It doesn't
> recognize the boundary relation, but it renders all polygons and
> therefor _also_ the boundary relations.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Tagging