[Tagging] Subjective Tags was: designated bike lane

Dave F. davefox at madasafish.com
Sat Jan 1 18:41:30 GMT 2011

On 01/01/2011 18:09, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 1/1/11 12:40 PM, Anthony wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Richard 
>> Welty<rwelty at averillpark.net>  wrote:
>>> On 1/1/11 11:52 AM, Anthony wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Greg Troxel<gdt at ir.bbn.com>    wrote:
>>>>> By trying to objectively tag the reality (not entirely possible of
>>>>> course), we also avoid all the debates about what is and isn't 
>>>>> safe in
>>>>> general, and where the dividing line is.
>>>> In this case I'm not even sure it's physically possible for a bicycle
>>>> to fit in the supposed bicycle lane, let alone safe.
>>> the debate over whether we should include judgmental informantion
>>> in tags (especially for bike lanes) has been going on for a while.
>>> maybe we need a tag which is understood to sometimes be judgmental.
>> What do you mean by "judgmental"?
> there have been arguments about whether safety considerations
> should factor into bike lane tagging, with some taking the posture
> that only physical and legal attributes should be mapped, and others
> wanting to include their judgment about whether a particular lane
> or path is "safe" for some definition of safe.

The main problem with subjective data was that people wanted to use the 
existing tags designed to describe the legality to describe "difficulty" 
(ability) of a way.

As long as different tags are used (as you describe) I see no problem 
with providing warnings

Dave F.

More information about the Tagging mailing list