[Tagging] designated bike lane

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Mon Jan 3 03:52:05 GMT 2011


On 01/01/2011 10:52 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Greg Troxel <gdt-2FjktZCtrC/QT0dZR+AlfA at public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> By trying to objectively tag the reality (not entirely possible of
>> course), we also avoid all the debates about what is and isn't safe in
>> general, and where the dividing line is.
> 
> In this case I'm not even sure it's physically possible for a bicycle
> to fit in the supposed bicycle lane, let alone safe.

Not having a sense of depth, I'd guess in the narrow spot it's about 4
feet wide, which is, believe it or not, the federal minimum width for
bike lanes (though I wish Ray would hurry up and adopt Oregon's 6 foot
lanes and make them mandatory to receive highway funding...)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20110102/509a56b0/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Tagging mailing list