[Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - stamping_point

[Zsolt Bertalan]

OK, I will do that!

I think site relation is not a good example for a relation, because I'd add
the tag to a member of the relation, but it's applicable for a building with
a yard mapped with a multipolygon relation.

Zsolt
Herrbert74

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com> wrote:

> Am 11.07.2011 16:00, schrieb Zsolt Bertalan:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I changed the status of this proposal to Proposed only today, although
> > the RFC was sent in February. Is it OK to start the voting in a few days
> > (hours)?
> > Luckily the history of the proposal wasn't inactive, I received some
> > comments on the Discussion Page. I answered them there and modified the
> > proposal a little bit. Anyone with better english skills than me is
> > welcome to clean up the page.
> > If I don't receive any more comments, I send out a Request for Voting.
>
> Please, have a statement that stamping_point=yes can be used with other
> tourism=* as long as the location is not known better.
>
> Relations (like site) should also be valid case.
>
> At least with pilgim stamp points are often located in
> tourism=attraction tagged building/sites.
>
> Thanks
> fly
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20110711/a6606421/attachment.html>