[Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - stamping_point

[Zsolt Bertalan]

I amended the page, but meanwhile someone made an interesting comment, that
we shouldn't use this on a building, because there is no building built for
that. I answered the following:

"Interesting point. I think the tag is not describing the building as a
whole, but only a feature. Also I don't like to tag nodes that are part of
a(n) way/area. And where do you put the node with the tag if the stamp is
inside the building, e.g. in a pub under the counter? Putting it on the
entrance would be misleading, because it implies that the stamp is on the
wall, so you can use it outside opening hours. On the other hand how can I
render the stamp if the house already have another icon? Would tagging a
node solve this problem? I think the render would not look nice. Herrbert74"

What is your opinion?
Does anyone know, how this would be rendered (in my own rendering for
hikers) if the building has already say, an amenity=pub tag (and I already
render pubs with icons)? What would be the best solution?

Zsolt
Herrbert74


On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Zsolt Bertalan <herrbert74 at gmail.com>wrote:

> OK, I will do that!
>
> I think site relation is not a good example for a relation, because I'd add
> the tag to a member of the relation, but it's applicable for a building with
> a yard mapped with a multipolygon relation.
>
> Zsolt
> Herrbert74
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Am 11.07.2011 16:00, schrieb Zsolt Bertalan:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > I changed the status of this proposal to Proposed only today, although
>> > the RFC was sent in February. Is it OK to start the voting in a few days
>> > (hours)?
>> > Luckily the history of the proposal wasn't inactive, I received some
>> > comments on the Discussion Page. I answered them there and modified the
>> > proposal a little bit. Anyone with better english skills than me is
>> > welcome to clean up the page.
>> > If I don't receive any more comments, I send out a Request for Voting.
>>
>> Please, have a statement that stamping_point=yes can be used with other
>> tourism=* as long as the location is not known better.
>>
>> Relations (like site) should also be valid case.
>>
>> At least with pilgim stamp points are often located in
>> tourism=attraction tagged building/sites.
>>
>> Thanks
>> fly
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20110711/7146b6c3/attachment.html>