[Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - stamping_point

[fly]

Am 11.07.2011 22:27, schrieb Zsolt Bertalan:
> I amended the page, but meanwhile someone made an interesting comment,
> that we shouldn't use this on a building, because there is no building
> built for that. I answered the following:
> 
> "Interesting point. I think the tag is not describing the building as a
> whole, but only a feature. Also I don't like to tag nodes that are part
> of a(n) way/area. And where do you put the node with the tag if the
> stamp is inside the building, e.g. in a pub under the counter? Putting
> it on the entrance would be misleading, because it implies that the
> stamp is on the wall, so you can use it outside opening hours. On the
> other hand how can I render the stamp if the house already have another
> icon? Would tagging a node solve this problem? I think the render would
> not look nice. Herrbert74"

If you tag it as node at the real position (e.g within a building first
level, 30 of the stairs on the left), it is OK. But at least a level=*
and a description=* would be appropriate.

> What is your opinion?
> Does anyone know, how this would be rendered (in my own rendering for
> hikers) if the building has already say, an amenity=pub tag (and I
> already render pubs with icons)? What would be the best solution?

It is the renderes choice which icon to render maybe it has an own extra
icon but I would not count on it.

cu fly

P.S.: Your are right about site relations.