[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hiking_checkpoint

[M∡rtin Koppenhoefer]

2011/7/15 Zsolt Bertalan <herrbert74 at gmail.com>:
> No, I see it as a tourism feature. I don't want to introduce a new
> namespace. The other tag (hiking_checkpoint=yes) is only needed in the rare
> case if we already have a tourism tag.


I agree to the others: don't propose 2 tags for the same thing. As you
say, stamping points (or hiking checkpoints) will usually / often be
related to touristic features. This is IMHO the reason why "tourism"
is not suitable as a key for them: they will already be represented by
a feature with a tourism key (e.g. attraction).

cheers,
Martin