[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hiking_checkpoint

[Zsolt Bertalan]

Oh, Gawd!

I think you are right. So my newest proposal :) would be:

checkpoint=hiking or cycling or whatever else
and instead of hiking_course=value course=value?

Zsolt

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:52 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2011/7/15 Zsolt Bertalan <herrbert74 at gmail.com>:
> > No, I see it as a tourism feature. I don't want to introduce a new
> > namespace. The other tag (hiking_checkpoint=yes) is only needed in the
> rare
> > case if we already have a tourism tag.
>
>
> I agree to the others: don't propose 2 tags for the same thing. As you
> say, stamping points (or hiking checkpoints) will usually / often be
> related to touristic features. This is IMHO the reason why "tourism"
> is not suitable as a key for them: they will already be represented by
> a feature with a tourism key (e.g. attraction).
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20110719/f53f7a3d/attachment.html>