[Tagging] fire alarms

John Smith deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
Sat Jun 4 08:48:41 BST 2011

On 4 June 2011 17:44, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 9:10 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 4 June 2011 17:02, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
>>> I don't know of any, but I would go with emergency=phone, and specify
>>> maybe in another tag phone=fire_alarm or some such thing.
>>> The description of emergency=phone includes 'making calls to emergency
>>> services' so it is not necessarily restricted to switches.
>> I didn't see any phone, just appears to have a switch you pull to
>> trigger an alarm.
> I'm sorry, I misunderstood - you're saying *your* fire alarms don't
> have two-way communication.
> emergency=phone is misleading then, as it implies two-way
> communication. emergency=alarm would be my intuitive choice too, then.

We don't have anything like that here, I was just going off the photo,
it seems from the description it would be an emergency phone for
someone wanting police, but just a dumb switch for fire.

As for tagging, emergency:police=phone, emergency:fire=switch maybe?

More information about the Tagging mailing list