[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sidewalks as separate ways
Jo
winfixit at gmail.com
Fri Mar 25 19:06:06 GMT 2011
We also need to add cycleways to associatedStreet relations then and bus
stops and their platforms and parking lanes. What roles do we assign for
those?
Polyglot
2011/3/25 David Paleino <dapal at debian.org>
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:07:12 +0000, SomeoneElse wrote:
>
> > What I don't yet understand is the workflow associated with the
> > "Sidewalk_as_separate_way" proposal. Through the window I can see a
> > road which has a (currently unmapped) footpath/sidewalk along both sides
> > for part of its length and one side after that. Perhaps someone could
> > explain (under the "Sidewalk_as_separate_way" proposal) I would map
> > that? How do I indicate where the footpath/sidewalk is actually
> > immediately adjacent to the road and where it isn't? What other ways or
> > relations (in addition to the road) do I need to create?
>
> I would map them as three ways (warning, ASCII art below):
>
> * |
> * |
> | * |
> | * |
> |--x--|
> | * |
> | * |
>
> The "|" are the two sidewalks, the "*" is the main road.
>
> Way marked with *:
>
> highway=residential (or whatever)
>
> Ways marked with |:
>
> highway=footway
> footway=sidewalk
>
> In the example above I've also put a crossing, the "--x--" line. This would
> be
> tagged as:
>
> highway=footway
> footway=crossing
> crossing=* (depending whether it has traffic lights, is/isn't marked,
> [..])
>
> For compatibility reasons with the current approach, I'd also tag the "x"
> node
> as:
>
> highway=crossing
>
> The relation is optional, but if you wanted to, you can put the road marked
> with
> "*" into an associatedStreet/street relation (with no role/"street" role),
> and
> the sidewalks ("|") with role "sidewalk".
>
> Kindly,
> David
>
> --
> . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
> : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
> `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
> `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20110325/add9e94f/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list