[Tagging] Vote / Opinion poll about history=event

[John Smith]

On 3 May 2011 02:02, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> To reduce the danger of edit wars: what about _not_ defining the
> events explicitly "significant" (most of German Wikipedia disputes are
> about "relevance criteria" and I'd rather avoid similar discussions in
> OSM if possible). Of course we all expect only "significant" events to
> be mapped, but requiring it explicitly will encourage others to delete
> stuff and say: but it was not significant (enough).

historic=battlefield is being lumped in with this vote as both are
non-physical in the long term and so some people think both shouldn't
be in OSM.