[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Turn Lanes
Peter Wendorff
wendorff at uni-paderborn.de
Thu Oct 6 10:17:49 BST 2011
Hi.
Some remarks have been mentioned here already, why this proposal is not
well designed.
Another one is, that it's tackling the lanes-problem, but not solving it.
You propose something for turning lanes - but again restrict it to cars.
The talk page in the wiki contains a question about cycle lanes, that
has been rejected to be solved by the proposal.
To go a little step further, it's even worse for
sidewalks/footpaths/pavements, which are unsolved wether to tag as
separate lanes, tags at the street way or whatever.
I don't think, these unfinished proposals are a good idea in this case,
as long as they don't solve the multi-lane problem in general (or are at
least designed to be extendable to solve the problem).
Here I cannot see this extendability.
regards
Peter
Am 06.10.2011 08:17, schrieb Ilya Zverev:
> Hi! Following discussions in this list and in couple of forum threads
> (and since there are some eager nav software programmers that wish to
> use the first proposal they see), I studied all of the proposals for
> tagging turn lanes and made a compound tagging scheme, which is not
> hard to use, but addresses mapping simplicity, presentation and
> routing. Please check it, and I'd be glad to answer your questions
> (but please use wiki talk page if possible: keeping mailing list
> threads is hard when you receive messages in digests).
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Turn_Lanes
>
>
> IZ
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list