[Tagging] Self explanatory?

Steve Bennett stevagewp at gmail.com
Sun Dec 9 11:10:14 GMT 2012

On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Martin Vonwald <imagic.osm at gmail.com>wrote:

> I was thinking about a problem that affects renderers and navigational
> devices in more or less the same way. I came up with a solution and
> would like to know if it is understandable. I mapped four areas with
> currently used tagging styles and added my solution. I would like to
> ask you to have a look at the following images and tell me if you
> understand what's going on. Please don't comment on the underlying
> tagging styles - I randomly selected some I know (and may or may not
> support them).
Hi Martin,
  It's not self-explanatory to me what problem you're trying to solve, or
how your solution is an improvement? What's wrong with simply forking one
way into two when a new lane appears? What advantage does this new triangle
have? What is its meaning?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20121209/2ce07379/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list