[Tagging] Amenity swimming_pool (was Amenity parking)

[Ben Johnson]

Yes, mapping peoples back yards is within that uncomfortable private zone..., but I justify it because in Australia it is practice in some areas for the fire department to draw water from private swimming pools in times of need - particularly in bush fire prone areas.

BJ

Sent from my iPhone

On 12/01/2012, at 6:38, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com> wrote:

> On the one hand I wouldn't bother tagging them, but for the ones that you did tag, I think you should go back and tag them private. The tennis courts too.
> 
> Every time I see solar panels shining on Bing, my fingers itch to tag them as power plants, but I don't think it makes a lot of sense to do so... It's borderline privacy transgression, isn't it?
> 
> Polyglot
> 
> 2012/1/11 John Sturdy <jcg.sturdy at gmail.com>
> I've been marking open-air swimming pools that I've spotted in back
> gardens etc, that are presumably private.  It struck me as odd to call
> them "amenities" as I take that to be something public.  Should I go
> back to them and mark them as "access=private" where they're clearly
> associated with houses?
> 
> Likewise, I've marked tennis courts that are either in gardens or in
> school / college grounds; perhaps I should tag those "private" too,
> and just leave those attached to sports centres not indicating their
> access?
> 
> __John
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20120112/07ca210e/attachment.html>