[Tagging] [OSM-talk] Mapping guidelines
baloo at ursamundi.org
Wed Jan 18 02:18:37 GMT 2012
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 15:25 +0100, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> Regarding Landuse=residential I do not agree with the approach of the
> two examples
> Apart from the aspect of overcrowding any map produced from this data,
> it is simply not helpful from a practical point of view. What
> additional information do I gain from excluding the road from the
> landuse area,
Well, in the Bakersfield example, thanks to the residential outlines and
trees, I spotted a median and an alley way that hadn't been mapped
without having to open an editor and WMS first.
> Let me use other landuse examples: military. There it is more obvious
> that the roads in the military area are used for military purposes. In
> the same sense residential roads are used for residential purposes.
True, but you can have military activity in a street. Heck, a military
could take "Occupy Wall Street" literally.
> Or look at the industrial landuse - would you exclude the service
> roads and any similar roads not dedicated to through-traffic?
No, but that would be analogous to a private/permissive living street in
an apartment complex. Same owner, area and ways used for other uses.
Granted, there's a bit of a judgement call in play, but I'm pretty sure
anybody who is intent on using landuse=* knows how nitpicky zoning is;
ideally landuse=* and zoning should be as congruent as practical in
regards to property lines and actual land use goes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Tagging