[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Escalators and Moving Walkways

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

Am 19.07.2012 um 23:40 schrieb Tobias Knerr <osm at tobias-knerr.de>:

> 18.07.2012 21:04, Martin Koppenhoefer:
>> Maybe there could be an additional value proposal for
>> "conveying" for cases where there is a moving walkway, but it is out
>> of order (for years in the case I am thinking about). Maybe
>> conveying=disused ?
> 
> To clarify: This is a "moving walkway" that never moves anymore, but you
> can still walk on ?

Yes. Probably disused=yes would be better than conveying=disused because this way you could still keep the information whether it is an escalator/travelator.

Cheers,
Martin