[Tagging] Reviving the conditions debate
Martin Vonwald
imagic.osm at gmail.com
Thu Jun 14 12:02:34 BST 2012
2012/6/14 Flaimo <flaimo at gmail.com>:
>>> Maybe someone can help me defining the following access restriction
>>> using the 1.5 proposal:
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Length_and_time_restriction_2.jpg
> alternate version:
>
> access:motorized.time=Mo-Su 00:00-10:00,18:00-24:00
> access!shortvehicle.length=5
> access:motorized?shortvehicle.time=24/7
Thanks.
My first impression of the 1.5 proposal is that one needs quite often
self defined rules, which results in quite a lot of tags.
>> I assume here, that agricultural and goods are more specific than
>> motor_vehicle. Any chance of simplifying this?
> this notation has the same flaw as the current access scheme. it mixes
> transportation modes and user roles. "motor_vehicle" is a
> transportation mode. "agricultural" is a user role. not everywhere on
> this planet "agricultural" automatically means "motor_vehicle". that
> is what the 1.5 proposal tries to solve.
Very true. The question is: should we mix a solution for conditional
tags with a cleanup of the current access scheme? Or should we try to
do it step by step?
Martin
More information about the Tagging
mailing list