[Tagging] Naming boundary ways

[sly (sylvain letuffe)]

> I had assumed it was constructed differently but maybe it isn't.
ok

It might, but if it does, it shouldn't as it would be an error as far as what 
we have documented for it is concerned.
But since one french contributor has decided against all others's will and 
local practices to change as he see fit several times, your comment raised in 
my mind the idea that he might have tried it again.

> There's  
> a relation in Chile where the admin=4 relation consists of all the 
> admin=6 relations or so, this is what I meant with different concept. 

Spain as well is using those subarea role constructions (in addition to the 
other model)
We spent countless hours in France evaluating the pros and cons of both 
methods but ultimetly coundn't decide wich was better so we sticked to what 
we called the "boundary model" (in opposition to the "surfaces sum model")

But that is off topic.

-- 
sly
qui suis-je : http://sly.letuffe.org
email perso : sylvain chez letuffe un point org