[Tagging] Status of building=stable

Martin Vonwald imagic.osm at gmail.com
Mon Oct 22 06:57:05 GMT 2012


As the massive objection-storm has settled down a little I'll document
that tag. ;-) Thanks to Martin and Alberto for their feedback.

Martin

2012/10/17 Martin Vonwald <imagic.osm at gmail.com>:
> 2012/10/17 Alberto <albertoferraris at fastwebnet.it>:
>>>You're right. I'll change the proposal in the following way:
>>>a) building=stable, no building:use: looks like a stable, used as a stable
>>>b) building=stable, building:use=<not stable>: looks like a stable,
>>>but used for something different
>>>c) building=<whatever>, building:use=stable: looks like <whatever>,
>>>but is used as stable
>>>I assume, that the majority of who used building=stable in the past
>>>meant "it is used as a stable".
>>>Better?
>>>Martin
>>
>> +1. Since this tag is already used, I think that you should also create a
>> page in active map features, not only in proposed features.
>> cheers
>> Alberto
>
> That's exactly what I want to do, but only after I'm sure that no one
> objects (too much).
>
> Martin



More information about the Tagging mailing list