[Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 17, 8

[St Niklaas]

> From: tagging-request at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 17
> To: tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:42:36 +0100
> 
> Send Tagging mailing list submissions to
> 	tagging at openstreetmap.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	tagging-request at openstreetmap.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	tagging-owner at openstreetmap.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Tagging digest..."
> 

>    8. Re: Clarify tag access doc (Martin Koppenh?fer)
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:42:23 +0200
> From: Martin Koppenh?fer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> 	<tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Cc: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> 	<tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Clarify tag access doc
> Message-ID: <D02B5280-A56B-4D00-8610-280F11B8E07D at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset=us-ascii
> 
> 
> 
> Am 11/set/2012 um 14:17 schrieb Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com>:
> > 
> > I'm currently trying to refresh a wiki translation of the Access key page:
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
> 
> 
> > I think too that a signle value is enough as already mentionned there.
> > If we keep "customer", we need another one for "employee" (vs
> > "custormer" parkings/entrances). Or I may suggest a subtag like
> > "access=destination" + "destination=customer/employee".
> 
> 
> Employee would be private IMHO, not destination
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > - "designated" vs "official". If I understand the wiki, the first is
> > "not compulsory and often marked by a traffic signal" where the second
> > is "complusory and always marked by a traffic signal". Is that correct
> > ?
> 
> 
> IIRR those were initially intended to mean the same.
> 
> 
> > So, for instance, as a router for
> > cars, how should I handle a road tagged with "access=official" (or
> > "designated") + "bicycle=yes" ?
> 
> 
> Strange tagging. Access=designated does not follow the convention <mode of transport>=designated. You cannot infer access restrictions for cars from this (I.e. fall back to the default, which depends on the highway class).
> 
> 
> > 
> > - is "permissive" a legal status, as the introduction says that values
> > are all about "legal access" ?
> 
> 
> Yes, it is a legal status that says you don't have an official right of way.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Martin
> 
Hi, I stumbled over this dispute, when I tagged a cycleway, designated as being special build, in my mind covering the allowed, with motorvehicles - permissive, allowed to go with a permit or a road with inhabitants only or HGV only ?What to use for a parkingaisle just for HGV ?Whats the difference between designated and allowed, when i started to tag I would like to fill it in ?
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 
> 
> End of Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 17
> ***************************************
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20120911/bf1c502c/attachment-0001.html>