[Tagging] Conditional Restrictions vs. Extended Conditions

[Ronnie Soak]

Hi again,
>
> there are more traps in that example. :-)
>

Traps? I've found a stray CR tag in the EC file, which I silently corrected.
And one part of the way was tagged 120 at wet even though it was probably
meant as without restriction, which I now also changed to be
symmetrical to the other side.
What else do you mean?

>> Did you want me to upload the result somewhere?
>
> If you want to, yeah.
https://chaos.binaervarianz.de/wp-content/extras/conditional-restrictions.osm
https://chaos.binaervarianz.de/wp-content/extras/extended-conditions.osm

Sorry, both files are heavily altered by JOSM.


>
>> How far did you get with the EC examples on the CR talk page?
>> I wasn't able to complete them as already at example #2 I felt the
>> need to specify a COMBINATION of two conditions, which I found no
>> solution for at the EC proposal.
>
> You are talking about the equivalent of
> taxi:conditional=no @ (occupants>8 AND 18:00-10:00)
> In Extended Condition tagging, this will become:
> taxi:(occupants>8):(18:00-10:00)=no

Oh, ok. I didn't know that. Taking another look at the EC page
actually reveals a similar case in the examples.
But an explicit note would be not a bad idea. For the moment, it is
not defined that multiple conditions are (or should) implicitly
combined with an AND operation.


Regards,
Chaos