[Tagging] access at own risk
gdt at ir.bbn.com
Thu Aug 1 12:11:30 UTC 2013
"John F. Eldredge" <john at jfeldredge.com> writes:
> On the other hand, a road labeled as "use at your own risk" may well
> be one that is not currently being maintained, meaning that you have
> increased odds of finding it impassable due to washouts, landslides,
> and the like. I have seen some one-lane tracks where any type of
> blockage would mean you would have to back up for a long ways before
> reaching a point where you could turn around.
Sure. So if we actually know that, the phsyical condition tags (or
having a gap where it's not a road) are appropriate. And roads without
that sign may not be any diffferent in condition. If you're arguing
that a "this road may not be functional sign" should get
instead of a road that merely has a connecticut-style disclaimer
then that seems fine.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Tagging