bulwersator at zoho.com
Thu Dec 5 10:10:27 UTC 2013
It should not be changed, garden is garden - private or not.
Filtering out access=private to show only public ones is trivial.
I see also no arguments for changing meaning of tag used over 150k times.
---- On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 01:37:06 -0800 cracklinrain <cra_klinrain at gmx.de> wrote ----
the wiki page of leisure=garden says that every ordinary garden, which
is not accessible by the public (not even once), can be tagged as
leisure=garden. You just have to tag it to access=private.
I actually do not think that this is helpful for anybody.
On the other hand: Isn't it already included in landuse=residential? So
will we really need this tag leisure=garden?
I would propose the usage of leisure=garden for public accessible (which
might include some private gardens) with a focus on more special plants.
Maybe as a subpart of a park.
Otherwise it should be deprecated in my opinion.
What do you think?
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging