[Tagging] leisure=garden

[bulwersator]

It should not be changed, garden is garden - private or not. 
Filtering out access=private to show only public ones is trivial.
I see also no arguments for changing meaning of tag used over 150k times.

---- On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 01:37:06 -0800 cracklinrain <cra_klinrain at gmx.de> wrote ---- 


Hi, 
 
the wiki page of leisure=garden says that every ordinary garden, which 
is not accessible by the public (not even once), can be tagged as 
leisure=garden. You just have to tag it to access=private. 
 
I actually do not think that this is helpful for anybody. 
 
On the other hand: Isn't it already included in landuse=residential? So 
will we really need this tag leisure=garden? 
 
I would propose the usage of leisure=garden for public accessible (which 
might include some private gardens) with a focus on more special plants. 
Maybe as a subpart of a park. 
 
Otherwise it should be deprecated in my opinion. 
 
What do you think? 
 
Cheers 
cracklinrain 
 
_______________________________________________ 
Tagging mailing list 
Tagging at openstreetmap.org 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20131205/20d7ae3b/attachment-0001.html>