[Tagging] leisure=garden

[bulwersator]

For example to render view of city from OSM data also data about private gardens, trees, swimming pools etc are necessary.

---- On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 04:26:18 -0800 Matthijs Melissen <info at matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote ---- 


I agree with Martin. Also the fact that an object (parking, garden, swimming pool) is private is in itself useful information for the general public. You might for example see a parking or garden on aerial imagery, and wonder if it's possible to go there.
 Related question: if someone decides to pave their backyard, is it still a garden?
 -- Matthijs
 On Dec 6, 2013 12:10 PM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
 
2013/12/6 Masi Master <masi-master at gmx.de>
 I think we don't should tag something at a private (really private) ground in a residential (except the house, entrance and way to it).
 IMO we don't need any private things like swimmingpools, ways, trees, sandboxes or playgrounds at the backyard in the OSM database.
 



-1

What is the argument for putting the house, the entrance and the private way then? IMHO we can map private trees, and I also like to map private swimming pools. Of course you can map private fences, walls etc., and why not map a private waterway? Making an evaluation in which areas of the cities there are private pools and in which there aren't might lead to interesting results for instance.
 

cheers,
Martin


 
_______________________________________________
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging at openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
 

 _______________________________________________ 
Tagging mailing list 
Tagging at openstreetmap.org 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20131206/804e38a2/attachment.html>