[Tagging] Topographic place names

Steve Bennett stevagewp at gmail.com
Thu Dec 12 04:29:33 UTC 2013

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Andrew Errington <erringtona at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:26:55 Steve Bennett wrote:Yes please!  I just added
> some hiking trails and had a named spur[1] that I
> wanted to record.  I used place=locality, but it seems wrong for the same
> reasons you give.  I'd suggest that since we have natural=peak, and
> natural=saddle we should have natural=spur.  natural=ridge, if it's not
> already used, should be for ridges.

natural=ridge is widely used (~8000) for ridges:
There's also natural=arrete (273):

Remarkably, there is not a single use of natural=spur. Maybe people just
tag them as ridges? Could use natural=ridge, ridge=spur to be more precise

>  Perhaps we could also have
> natural=feature for a general named 'thing' that is visible and well known.
174 examples already:
Taginfo doesn't seem to show any other information on them - I'd like to
see how else they're being used.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20131212/037adde0/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list